Monday, August 22, 2011

ZERO An Investigation Into 9/11 (Video)

Zero 911 Doc[1]Found this great 9/11 documentary film on YouTube (Full Length).




"ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account. Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Nobel Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, "What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity." The importance of this film can not be overstated, if its thesis is correct, the justification for declaring the war on terror is built on a series of outrageous lies."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1297858/
This is probably the best Documentary about the 9/11 bogus investigation yet. I encourage all to see this film and show it to as many people as you can. After watching this, there is no way you will be able to accept the official story.

YOUTUBE DESCRIPTION FOR THIS VIDEO:
Please visit http://zero911movie.com/site/ and purchase the whole movie to help support the people who worked hard to produce such an outstanding film. ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary from Italian production company Telemaco explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account.
Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Nobel Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, "What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity."
The importance of this film can not be overstated. If its thesis is correct, the justification for going to war in Iraq is built on a series of outrageous lies.
On Tuesday 26th February, Europarlementarian Guilietto Chiesa invited his colleagues and the press to attend the screening and debate of the Italian-produced documentary named 'ZERO, an investigation into the events of 9/11'. Object of the screening was to create political awareness of the faulty official investigation into the events by the 9/11 Commission.
Besides Mr Chiesa, the panel consisted of Japanese parlementarian Fujita, Dr David Ray Griffin, film distributor Tim Sparke & the director and producers of the film.
After his opening statements, Mr Chiesa welcomed his guest speakers, including the producers, director and distributor of the documentary. Mr Chiesa pointed out that he was unable to find any distributor in his native country of Italy and was happy to find a company in the UK, led by Mr Tim Sparke, to handle worldwide distribution of this important film. 'It is important to realize,' he emphasized 'that the movie was made thanks to contribution and donations of hundreds of citizens who feel a new investigation is more than warranted.' No less than 450 people worked on this documentary on a voluntary basis. They never received any kind of payment. Their reward is the movie itself, which they feel is an instrument to create awareness and a means to provoke a political debate in Europe. Read the rest on 9/11 Blogger....
http://www.911blogger.com/node/14103
Share it, tweet it, Facebook it and spread the word!
AP13! (<>13<>)

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Fake Alien Invasion Would End Economic Slump (VIDEO)

Project Blue Beamhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/15/paul-krugman-fake-alien-invasion_n_926995.html

I watched Rachael Maddow report on this too... interesting that Maddow has the guts (or perhaps the naivety) to even go there. (see video below)

Project Blue Beam discussed in the MSM! WOW!!!!!

Quote:Paul Krugman is so frustrated by the lack of support for another round of stimulus spending that he's now calling for a fake alien invasion of the United States to spur a World War II-style defense buildup.

[...]

"If we discovered that, you know, space aliens were planning to attack and we needed a massive buildup to counter the space alien threat and really inflation and budget deficits took secondary place to that, this slump would be over in 18 months," he said. "And then if we discovered, oops, we made a mistake, there aren't any aliens, we'd be better--"

"We need Orson Welles, is what you're saying," Rogoff cut in.

"There was a 'Twilight Zone' episode like this in which scientists fake an alien threat in order to achieve world peace," Krugman said. "Well, this time, we don't need it, we need it in order to get some fiscal stimulus."


Here's the Rachel Maddow segment from last night...

Maddow even made mention of Alan Moore's "Watchmen." ... very interesting! And of course, the old classic... Reagan's UN speech about how we would set aside all our differences if faced with an Alien Threat, etc.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with "Project Blue Beam," here's a couple short videos that explain it...

Very strange and suspicious... I'm somewhat at a loss to understand why the MSM would report on this.

My wild speculation would be to dispel belief in Project Blue Beam... maybe what they are doing is trying to firmly establish it as conspiracy theory so that when it happens, they can say, "Oh we covered that and it's just a bunch of noise from the tin-hatters."

So are they doing a bit of pre-damage control here?

I'm guessing next will be the dissection of the possibility, complete with claims reassuring the public that they don't have the means to pull off such a hoax... which, of course, they do. But if they did this then they know many will start crying foul and talking Project Blue Beam so could this be their preemptive discrediting of any notion of it being a flase flag?

Just my stab in the dark but I wonder what the angle is here.

And here's the thing guys... I don't see Blue Beam as being by necessity to mean that there are no aliens and everything we've been seeing in the sky is secret military tech. I've personally gone back and forth over the fence on this and recently been inclined to think that most of what we see lately ARE military antigravity craft, however, there is just too much evidence in ancient cultures that suggest ET visitations... I struggle to understand that kind of stuff and always remind myself that some of these ancient references to sky beings may just be metaphorical. So it's really difficult for me to say one way or the other if we are actually being visited by Aliens but I lean toward yes, but still keep my feet planted in the center.

If the Aliens are real then there are many good reasons why they do not make contact... we know about this, and have ourselves imagined the reasons for advanced cultures to keep their distance... a La Star Treks Prime Directive, etc.

But for whatever reason, they appear, for the most part to maintain a stance of non-intervention... or perhaps our Gov was approached with offers of assistance, but I don't see this as being logical as any enlightened aliens can clearly see that Government is the wrong people to contact. If they really meant well, they would bring their offer to the people, not our corrupt politicians and military leaders.

So I'm wondering if Blue Beam, like many other conspiracies, is designed to achieve several goals... one of which might be the subject of the HuffPo article, to justify military build up to combat some "alien threat." Perhaps if they try to do this hoax alien invasion, the real aliens will come out and try to defend their reputation or might seek to warn the people of the lie, which gives TPTB the opportunity to turn the haox into the real thing and justify attacking them. They will say, "The aliens talk of peace but look how they attack us!" The people will be so full of fear that they will hedge their bets and opt for defense and Voila! TPTB have their reason for attacking the ETs and once again prevent the benevolent aliens from reaching the people and waking them up.

So could this be an elaborate plan designed ultimately to provoke the real ETs into an armed conflict?

It's also important to note that it doesn't have to withstand intensive scrutiny or fool everybody, it just has to fool the dumbed-down component of the population. Most of the people in the world are living in poverty conditions... they have no access to technology and wouldn't know the difference between a holographic projection and the real thing.

They only have to fool the majority so the tech used for this has only to be good enough to fool the dumbs... and there are more of them than smarties!

When the inevitable nay-saying of the people with brains occurs, they simply write them off as tin-hatters.

But there won't be time for close examination... we're talking war with aliens here so just like the emergency passing of the Patriot Act, there will be the fevered rush to combat the threat, massive influx of confusing and frightening info and all the other ways they can distract and evade scrutiny. Just like 9/11... the initial shock and awe will effectively disarm immediate inquiry.

The way TPTB operate can be very counter intuitive... lotta reverse psychology going on. It's really rather brilliant when you think about it. And as I have said before... believe you me, they got their act together.

I often site things like endowments and research funds, set up by billionaires that not only serve to endear them to the public by making them look charitable, but many of these "studies" funded by these philanthropic organizations end up being psychological studies and such... which in turn give them valuable intel on the pulse of the public psyche. In this way, they trick donors into funding the very research used to manipulate them, while they unwittingly believe they are funding research to help society. It's so very diabolical.

So I see this as a preemptive psyop, designed to establish the idea of Blue Beam as conspiracy theory. Since there are those like us who are aware of this plan, they have to appear as though they acknowledge that as urban legend so when they really do it they can say, "Well you don't really think we would talk about hoaxing an alien invasion in the MSM and then actually do it, expecting people to believe it's real?" See how that works? By coming out and talking about it in MSM, they create a logic block in the mind of the public that makes us think they would be stupid to actually try to do it after making such a plot known to the public. Then, if it actually happens, people will all the more believe it has to be real.

So this kind of reverse psychology is really designed to reinforce the believability of the event, if and when they put it into action. Afterwords, anyone who tries to say it was really a hoax will look stupid and be called a conspiracy theorist. The idea will be viewed as so unlikely that most will not give it enough merit to even barely examine the evidence, even if it proves it's a hoax beyond a shadow of a doubt. Just like 9/11, which is definitively an inside job, but so many cannot believe our Government would actually do something so horrid, that they won't even look at the evidence, rather, they avoid it like the plague for fear of ridicule or being categorized as a crack pot conspiracy theorist.

They know what they are doing and know exactly how to push our psychological buttons.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing Whistle On False Flag Terror!

Photobucket Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing Whistle On False Flag Terror.

A British police intelligence analyst who was asked to create a strategic assessment concerning terror threats was fired when he told his superiors that the threat of an “internal tyranny” was far greater than that of Islamic terrorism, after discovering that both 7/7 and 9/11 were false flag attacks.

http://www.deepjournal.com/p/43/a/en/2970.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-intelligence-analyst-fired-for-blowing-whistle-on-false-flag-terror.html

Of course, since we are nearing the anneversary of 9/11 the media is in full "reinforcement of the official story" mode.

Today in the Tacoma News Tribune, I read a story about 9/11 conspiracy theorists... they basically tried to play the "Psychological cause for conspiracy thinking" card by saying that people have a need to make "random events" make sense... "it's only natural," they say.

From JFK to Sept. 11, conspiracy theories thrive

What a bunch of bullshit!

As if people would rather believe that our own Government doing such things is somehow more comforting than the idea of 19 cave-dwelling radicals with box cutters. Their logic is so full of shit. I don't think anybody feels comforted knowing that this was a state sponsored false flag.

And they also managed to put statements from NIST, complaining that they just can't imagine why people don't accept their 6 year study... and explaining how they showed that fire caused the collapse of the floors...

Well, what they did not say is that it took NIST 6 years to get the results they were looking for, by fudging the numbers... they had to double the amount of heat produced by the fire in order to initiate collapse, and even then, there was no confirmation of their ridiculous pancake theory.

 


Bottom line is the NIST experiments were corrupt, they changed the parameters of the experiment to achieve a predetermined result and the conditions of their experiments far exceeded what was even possible. Total lies, yet the paper tried to affirm this bogus study as being definitive.

They are trying really hard to perpetuate the lie and combat the wave of truth that always occurs this time every year.

 

Friday, August 5, 2011

Cost of War to the United States

We've all seen those ticker sites, like U.S. National Debt Clock that shows the numbers in real time... pretty scary stuff!
I recently came across this site...  Cost of War to the United States Now with all this business with our economy and the apparant inability by our elected officials to solve the debt issues, it's pretty clear to see how we can easily solve these problems.

Aside from the obvious... eliminate the Bush tax cuts for the very rich... they can well afford it and besides, the expiration of these cuts was agreed upon when they were enstated. It's time for you filthy rich Scrooges to stick to the agreement and pay up like real Americans and quit your whining... you have NOTHING to complain about. What? Do you really think your not being able to buy that second Yacht or summer home in Hawaii is equivelant to the average middle class family trying to figure out how they are going to make their next mortgage payment? Times are tough for everybody but you so it's time you felt a bit of discomfort while the rest of us are writhing in pain.

The Bush Tax Cuts have NOT produced any jobs. And how could they? Tax cuts on the PERSONAL INCOMES of the rich DOES NOT go back into their company, much less create more jobs. When was the last time you heard of some rich corporate board member putting his own personal money back into the company? Well, that is, unless it's to purchase stock shares, which then usually means they will inflate the value through some form of trickery or "creative accounting," only to sell that stock and leave the company high and dry. Who amongst you really believe it's a good idea to line the pockets of the rich? ...These very same people who say the lower classes are irresponsible, stupid and spend beyond their means... do you really think the rich, who make lame excuses and blame you for our economic woes are gonna save you by creating jobs... with their own personal incomes? If you believe that then you are either a shill for the rich, with something to gain from this lie, or you are a complete moron.

In any case, nobody seems willing to acknowledge the giant elephant in the room... these illegal wars that are destroying our economy as well as our reputation in the world community. The Tax Payers in the US are handing over huge profits to the campaign contributors of our elected officials... military and private contractors... who do very well as long as there is perpetual war. It's time we took a good look at our current strategy and realize that perpetual war against so-called terrorism is a profit industry, designed never to achieve success.

Since all this is based on the wave of fear and ignorance that followed the events of 9/11, nobody seems capable of pointing the finger at the real problem... our incompetent (and probably complicit) corrupt Government that either failed miserably in preventing the attack, or themselves perpetrated it as a false flag. Either way they have proven ineffective as leaders and protectors of the citizens of the United States. With a fraction of the money wasted on these wars we would do much better to root out the culprits within our own midst and replace them with people who can actually do the job.The cost of doing that is minimal by comparison.

And I for one am all for any expense for stricter oversight of elected officials. All this bullshit about Government being too big is merely a ploy to get we the people off their back... in other words, they want more privacy to get away with more corruption. Government is not too big, it's lopsided... it needs to be shrunk in some areas and expanded in others... like I say, no amount of oversight, providing real accountability, is too costly to tax payers. In fact, it is THE most valued area in which to spend the public trust. The amount of money to be saved by eliminating corruption will more than pay for all our societal needs... and then some!

So for now, it's perfectly clear that these wars are NOT sustainable and nothing we can do in the short term... be it tax cuts for the rich or cutting much needed public services... amounts to anything but a bandaid on a shotgun wound. The looming and rapidly accumulating cost of war will destroy this countries economy. And nothing can stop that except ending these illegal and ineffective conflicts.



Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Comcast Interfering with 911 Emergency Calls!

http://mobilelocalsocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/DR-EVIL-COMCAST-150x150.jpgSo last Saturday I was blissfully slumbering away the morning when I heard my sister screaming her head off... she comes bursting into my room shouting, "There's something wrong with Buddy..." Buddy is my 64 year old step Dad, 'Nam veteran who has had a stroke, two heart attacks and a quadruple bypass.

So I go running outside in my tighty-whities to find that he had fallen down the ten-foot high rockery into the creek below. He was just sitting there in a daze, all bloody and scraped up... what concerned me was the gushing gash on his head.

I tell my ma to call 911 as I and my sis climb down to help my poor step-pops. He was bleeding all over the place due to the Kumaden blood thinning meds he's on.

So my Mother tries to call 911 but get this... Comcast answers and starts asking for her address confirmation... they didn't give two shits what the emergency was. She demanded to be connected with the local 911 dispatch and they just put her on hold. She hangs up and calls back... same runaround... she ended up talking to three different Comcast people, all asking the same address confirmation question before, finally getting transferred to the REAL 911! It took over three minutes just to get the actual, real 911 operator and even they said that WE had to get him out of the creek ourselves because apparently those ultra-brave, heroic and macho Fire Fighters don't wanna get their precious widdy-biddy tootsies wet!

Fortunately the gigantic swollen welt on my step Dads ankle was just a bruise and not a break... and even though he was woozy from landing head-first on a jagged boulder, we were able to walk him the 100 feet or so, against the current on rocks slippery from algea, to my neighbors property where they have a stairway leading up from the creek. Otherwise I guess we'd a been screwed and they would have left him in the creek. In any case, nice move on the part of the 911 dispatcher, wrongfully recommending that we move an injured person without knowing (or having the expertise to know) if he had suffered any internal injuries. So much for common sense.

So after talking to three unnecessary go-betweens we finally get the emergency call through and soon, the firemen show up... take their sweet time by strolling slowly through the house like they were walkin on the friggin beach, making sure to take note of all our stuff (you know how their priority #1 is to look for suspicious things... after all, they're all being trained nowadays to suspect ordinary citizens as potential terrorists!) and finally get to my step Dad. They just kind of stood around for a few minutes without even examining him. When they finally did their examination, one of the three firemen wandered off... I don't know where.. probably snooping around and lookin' in people's windows for more of that elusive, suspicious behavior.

Well, they put a couple bandages on my ole pops and, I shit you not, it' was like they had never applied a wound dressing in their lives... where the hell do they find these incompetent morons? They seemed quite reluctant to do their jobs and were in no hurry to do it.

I drove him to the local hospital where he was finally treated by some real professionals. Nothing was broken, fortunately, and he only got a few staples in his head. So he's down for about a week, all bandaged up like a frickin' Mummy, but thankfully it wasn't much worse... you should see some of the jaged boulders he could have landed head-first on!

So now I'm pissed as Hell at fucking "Comcrap" and their interference! What the Hell do they think they are doing catching 911 calls?

Well, turns out that there are some technical issues for Comcast Digital Voice customers in regards to routing their 911 calls to the proper local emergency dispatch. OK... I can see that but I just read through their subscriber policy and it would appear that their issue has to do with confirming the customers address in order to figure out the nearest 911 call center. Sure... I guess they can't simply LOOK AT THE FUCKING CUSTOMER PROFILE, or simply use the SAME ADDRESS THEY SEND THE GODDAMN BILL TO EVERY FUCKING MONTH! Idiots!!!!!!! S977

Now in their agreement there are about half-a-dozen places where they indemnify themselves for the possible (probable) results of their delaying 911 calls. By being a customer, you agree not to hold them liable if for any reason they fail to allow you access to emergency numbers! And that aint all... they also reserve the right to bill you, retroactively if they so choose, for such special calling like local 911, which if they didn't interfere in the first place wouldn't cost them a damn cent!

Here's the meat of the agreement...

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT COMCAST WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SERVICE OUTAGE, INABILITY TO DIAL 911 USING THE SERVICES, AND/OR INABILITY TO ACCESS EMERGENCY SERVICE PERSONNEL. YOU AGREE TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS COMCAST AND ITS AFFILIATES, SUPPLIERS OR AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, FINES, PENALTIES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES) BY, OR ON BEHALF OF, YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY OR USER OF THE SERVICES RELATING TO THE FAILURE OR OUTAGE OF THE SERVICES, INCLUDING THOSE RELATED TO 911/E911.

http://www.comcast.com/Corporate/Custome...ement.html


Note that it does not define "INABILITY TO DIAL 911 USING THE SERVICES, AND/OR INABILITY TO ACCESS EMERGENCY SERVICE PERSONNEL" as being due to outage... nope... they mean for any reason at all.

Now it also appears that they want to tack on an extra charge for allowing you access to tax-payer funded emergency services... they know people in a crisis are a captive audience and if there is a buck to make off someone's tragedy, then apparently they aren't above taking advantage.

But I also noted in there that they do need to confirm the address of a customer in order to rout your 911 calls correctly, even though they already have your address as I said, they sure as Hell know where to send them bills! And they also say to allow up to three days to properly plug the local 911 call routing into your account. Well, my folks have been a Comcast customer for about 6 years, so I think they have had their three days and then some! Apparently, they forgot to do this very important procedure when they initially set up the account years ago.

So from what I can tell, this is what happened...

My Mom, 6 year Comcast customer, dials 911 and the call is automatically routed to a Comcast employee because they FAILED to set up emergency number routing on my folks subscription six damn years ago! So what they had to do is confirm this info on the spot so they could enter it into their computers in order to cover their asses for not doing so when my folks first subscribed to the service! "OOPS! We screwed up so I guess you're dead!" They did this regardless of the immediate emergency and had to have THREE different Comcast employees put my poor panicky Mom though this ridiculous bullshit before getting the help we needed!

So my step-pops lays there bleeding in the creek with no help because Comcast forgot to dot the 'i's" and cross the "t's!"

There should be a law against any corporate communication company inserting themselves as a go-between and interfering with emergency 911 calls... fortunately for Comcast however, they have repeatedly indemnified themselves from liability for such interference... something that obviously shows their awareness that people will suffer, and possibly die, as a result of their meddling in the name of making a few extra bucks off the misfortune of their customers.

If you have Comcast Xfinity service with Digital Voice, better make sure your emergency 911 calls are being properly routed. With an average 6 minutes response time for emergency personell in a major city, the three extra minutes of Comcast "cover-our-asses" delay bumps response time up to 9 minutes... which in the case of many types of injuries, means you're probably gonna die because of a shitty cable company trying to profit from your crisis.

Fuck Comcast.... Fuck them up their stupid asses!

Friday, July 22, 2011

The Hidden Tech That Could Be Watching You!


OK... this is something I have been warning about for several years now... 

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles...camera.htm

 A popular video circulating on You Tube shows the discovery of a spy camera and a microphone hidden inside a digital TV converter box. Such devices are part of a government and industry surveillance program that is undoubtedly connected to the forced digital TV switchover being rolled out in the UK and US.




"I could not believe my eyes," states the blurb accompanying the video clip, "I have a friend who is kind of a conspiracy theorist. He was trying to convince me that many of the digital TV convert boxes that are coming out have microphones and cameras built into them. Knowing a bit about electronics I bought one of these devices opened it up fully intending on proving him wrong. To my surprise he was right. This device has both a miniature camera lens and what looks like a microphone. I was so shocked I took pictures and video. Please send this out to everyone you know who is using one of these devices."

The camera and microphone were hidden inside a MAGNAVOX TB110MW9 Digital to Analog Converter box. We are not suggesting that every digital cable box has a spy camera and microphone inside, so ripping open your cable box is not a good way to prove this one way or another - but the fact remains that companies like Google and Comcast have openly announced that they plan to use hidden cameras and microphones inside their products to spy on consumers.

Watch the clip below.


Now I've mentioned this electronics warning label before...



Note the words, "THIS DEVICE MUST ACCEPT ANY INTERFERENCE RECEIVED, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE THAT MAY CAUSE UNDESIRED OPERATION."

Before 2003 it said, "THIS DEVICE MUST NOT ACCEPT ANY INTERFERENCE RECEIVED, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE THAT MAY CAUSE UNDESIRED OPERATION."

So what could they possibly mean by, "INCLUDING INTERFERENCE THAT MAY CAUSE UNDESIRED OPERATION," I wonder?

I think most of you can all do the math on this one.

And I should also note that CCD sensors in digital cameras are sensitive to infra-red light.

Manufacturers of devices with wireless remote controls have found it cost effective to use these cheap pinhole camera CCD sensors for their remote control sensors. The remotes have a sort of light bulb in them that flashes in certain sequences depending on the button pressed. These light bulbs emit infra red light that cannot be seen by the human eye. The Wii remote contains such a CCD camera and the Wii receiver, a long black strip you put on top of your tv has two diodes. That's how the remote tracks movement. This all uses digital camera CCD sensors that, yes, are indeed capable of resolving an image. These cheap CCDs were said to be cheaper to convert to the task of detecting remote control signals than other tech such as RF or what have you. Oh the irony that they are using pinhole cameras, which are sold as SPY CAMERAS for their tiny size and ease of concealment. You can buy them in bulk for about 5 bucks a piece, probably for pennies when buying tens of thousands at a time and what's worse, many of them are made in China!

Convenient huh? So they have managed to disguise their illegal invasive spy camera as a harmless remote sensor. But make no mistake about it, this is a camera sensor connected to a network that is watching YOU!

In other words, that spot on your DVD player or TV that contains the remote receiver IS A CAMERA POINTED AT YOU AND YOUR FAMILY! Yes, that's right. You may already have cameras in your home that are connected to a live network.

Now since the cable box not only receives but also sends info to the network, you essentially have a two way device with a camera pointed right at you, feeding that image back to the cable company 24/7/365! Even when turned off, if it's still plugged into the wall outlet and your cable is connected to it, there is nothing stopping them from accessing this camera. 

But I will say that, this video may be a hoax as I will admit the guy has already opened the case before filming. It would be more credible if he showed us a sealed box from the store so we could know he had not pre-tampered with it or simply installed the camera himself. However, this is something manufacturers and cable companies have openly discussed and want to do anyway. They will sell this as a convenience and add features similar to the XBOX Kinect, which the public is being weened on as a harmless and useful thing. So it's not inconceivable that manufacturers could start placing the capability into the current generation of set top boxes now, in anticipation of "new features and capabilities" in future updates. This would also be a good excuse for them to do this now as they would say it saves the cost of replacing millions of boxes in the future. They could easily claim that the cams and mics are not currently being used now but are there for, as I said, future expansion of cable box capability... whatever excuse they need to trick the public into thinking this is harmless and innocent.

So believe it or not if you wish but this is nothing new and certainly not something that is even all that hidden, Like I say, they have mentioned their desire to put these components in tv boxes and many, many people have supposedly found them inside their boxes. It may only be in a few now but that's how these slippery slopes start. If you don't want it, they will charge you through the nose for one without cams and mics and those on a budget will just say screw it and accept the danger of having one of these in their homes. After a time, people will be used to it and stop caring, just like they have with the TSA "Freedom Gropes."

They want to do this, they can do this, they will do this and they probably ARE doing this right now. The tech is cheap and easy.

And for those of you who think there is no need to spy on every single person on the planet, or that they lack the manpower to monitor all those feeds, you are both right and wrong. You see, they don't need actual people to monitor. They have super computers that do the job in far less time and at much greater volume. And it's not intended to  monitor everybody in real time, rather it is intended to collect information, possibly for later use if the need arises. And yes, digital storage is abundant enough and cost effective enough for them to record everything, all the time.

So they don't have to watch you in real time with a guy in a chair staring at a screen, they will simply use their sophisticated super computers and complex algorithms to search and tag any piece of info they think is useful... all they need is audio and video of you trash talking a politician, or video of you smoking pot on your couch to label you a terrorist and a national security threat. Then it's off to the FEMA camps with you! Even the most innocent private activities can be portrayed as terrorism... owning guns, wearing blue jeans, etc... so this is them collecting "evidence" on everybody, just in case they need an excuse to take you out of the game.

Now this says it all...

[Image: TotalInformationAwareness.jpg]

With a logo like that, do you really believe they wouldn't implement such a cheap, easy technology, especially since we unwittingly bring it into our homes? The mandatory switch to digital only broadcast is exactly the move they would make to ensure this covert surveillance gets in place in all of our homes. Why is that so hard for people to believe, unless of course, they think the powers that be are a bunch of loveable fuzzy bunnies who just want everything to be all sunshine and double rainbows?

The XBOX Kinect may be the precursor to putting this tech in everything. This is coming, whether we want it or not and they are already doing this with cell phones that are designed so Law Enforcement can access and activate the cam and mic remotely without the user being aware. In any case, the warning label IS a reality and has been since 2003... if that doesn't wake you up then I don't know what else will. So even if this video is a hoax, then why would somebody make it? The conspiracy theorist in me might speculate that it's possibly "shock test," put out intentionally by TPTB to gauge our reaction to such tech... the XBOX Kinect is the SOLUTION to that negative reaction that will change our minds and make us accept it without seeing the dangers. If so then they would WANT certain people to realize that the video above is a hoax... that way we relax after the initial shock. In the mean time, they have got the data they needed. They know what they are doing and EXACTLY how to measure our tolerance and manipulate us.

Kinect is already touting capabilities such as two-way video communications, facial recognition, etc... and the new iPad also has such features. Of course, it will be sold to the public as "convenience" features and if we are stupid enough, we will fail to see the "Big Brother" style invasive possibilities of such tech and ignorantly accept it into our homes.

Now imagine you are shopping for new cloths and want to see what they look like on you without even leaving the house? Just stand in front of the TV, let the handy-dandy built in 3D cam take a picture of you and simply pick out whatever clothing item you want and Voila! It shows a picture of you in that groovie new outfit! Order it up right there and in a few days, it shows up at your door. Wow! How convenient huh? You didn't even have to leave your house and think of all the gas you saved not having to drive to the store... see how this works now? See how they sell this as a good thing? We all want to save gas and avoid the crowds, don't we? Kinect can ALREADY do this. Also... hold a document up and it scans and sends it for you... another great convenience! So if you really think cable companies aren't looking at the iPhone, iPad and Kinect capabilities and at very least, seeing the sales potential and available bandwidth on today's broadband cable, then you don't know the tech business market very well. The digital cable box is already incorporating new, interactive features, such as commercials where a menu pops up offering you more info in the form of an on-demand video? This is the logical direction this tech is headed toward... it's capable of doing this and WILL be doing this very soon. Don't believe me? Well read it and weep, my friends...

Kinect tech destined for TV-embedded greatness in 2011, HTPC integration later this year
From Tel Aviv unknown to Xbox gaming wunderkind, PrimeSense has already had quite a run, but the camera-control tech that powers Kinect is destined for new applications before long. VP Adi Berenson tells Engadget the company's already signed deals to put PrimeSense inside HTPCs by the end of the year, and has at least one cable company ready to launch a gesture-controlled set top box by summer 2011.

The problem is that this certainly will be tapped by the bogus war on terrorism bullshit, which would certainly promote it's implementation based on the current security hysteria. This is EXACTLY the kind of thing they would want and would LOVE to have at their disposal. And I think those of us who really have our eyes open know this is too attractive, too easy and too cheap for them NOT to do. And the dumbed-down public, eager for the latest high-tech toys will accept this without even considering how such technology can be abused by the growing totalitarian police state.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Rupert Murdoch Is NOT A Shapshiffter... Here's Why



[Originally posted here... http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-OMG-Rupert-Murdock-A-Shapshiffter?pid=1471877#pid1471877]

OK, someone asked me to comment on this so here's my take...

First of all, I would point out that it is common practice amongst tabloid media news papers to photoshop their pictures. Often certain changes are made to create a certain mood in the viewer. A good example is the recent Time magazine cover photo of Gaddafi...

This Gaddafi photo has been photoshopped in the following ways to manipulate viewer perception: Color shifted to cool tones (bluish color cast) to add a coldness to the skin tone... Narrowing of the shoulders to make him appear weak and feminine... hands and head enlarged to make him appear monstrous and grotesque... contrast and sharpness enhanced to emphasize skin blemishes and veins. Now this is not my theory, it is a fact admitted by the editors... I saw them talking about this in an interview. This was done, of course, to depict him as an inhuman monster... Madison Ave Advertizing Techniques 101! ALL, and I mean ALL photos in magazines and newspapers are processed to have maximum psychological and perceptual impact on the viewer... absolutely no exceptions whatsoever. Photos from news and magazines, for this reason, are completely unreliable as they are typically edited to the point of barely resembling the original image. The MSM uses images for psychological effect, not for exacting scientific representation. Media is a business, not a public service. Impact trumps accuracy every single time.

So considering Murdock is on the hot seat, I do not find it strange at all that newspaper photos of him would be altered to make him appear inhumanly grotesque, as this is a very, VERY common practice.

Also notable is that this photo was obviously taken with a wide angle lens, which distort and elongate areas near the outer edge of the image. This is known as "Barreling." This is common for that kind of lens which is why his fingers appear elongated... I can clearly see the image is stretched... note the extreme angle of the hood of the car and the apparent smallness of the person in the far end of the passenger seat... these kind of size distortions are only possible with a wide angle or fish-eye lens. Wide lenses are very useful for this kind of drive-by photo journalism as many times there are crowds of photographers and one must hold the camera above their head to get the shot... when doing so, a wide lens ensures that you will get the subject in frame by pointing in the general direction when you cannot look through the viewfinder to frame the shot with a narrow field view lens.

Now the discoloration of the hand is due in part to the fact that this old coot is frickin 80 years old... they're called varicose veins... I see that this area of the shot is very grainy (noisy) which is typical for night shooting when high ISO must be used which is very prone to signal noise in low light areas. This lack of light and high sensitivity plus the fact that his hands are already pretty old-guy lookin' make for pretty muddy detail so from a technical photography point of view, nothing looks out of the ordinary in this photo to me.

But I would also keep in mind that TPTB and the MSM might take advantage of the belief in shape-shifting reptilian aliens, knowing full well that if they photoshopped such an image in just the right way, this kind of frenzy would be whipped up... if the intent is to portray the subject in a bad light, then any bad press is good press, if you catch my drift. I think from time to time MSM does subtly alter things hoping the shape-shifter crowd will key on it so I urge caution. This entire shape-shifter thing might well be a propaganda tool in itself, being used to distract and to discredit those who believe in it. But I wouldn't put it past the MSM to use such tactics to further damage the image of any given subject.

Murdock is an evil, lying, manipulative and power-mad piece of shit, granted, but I find it troubling that people need to believe some elitist has to be an alien to be as evil as they are. And again, I ask why, in this time of unprecedented fear in the world, would these shape-shifters (who supposedly get their power from human fear) would be having trouble maintaining their transmogrification? Humans are plenty capable of such evil without being aliens by necessity. Anybody remember a guy named Hitler? He was 100% human so enough with this shape-shifter nonsense.

Murdock is old as dirt and has veiny, bony old guy hands... so what? And wide lenses distort images. Ignorance of photography technology is not proof of alien shape-shifters but laymen will never understand this as long as they are being dumbed down by our shitty education system.

So no shape-shifting aliens here, sorry to say.


Sunday, July 17, 2011

Video Analysis - NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film

[The following is my reply to a post at http://www.niternat.com/forum/topics/ali...ht-on-film and also at http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Video-Analysis-NASA-s-Alien-Anomalies-caught-on-film I wanted to share it here to have a chance to explain some of what is seen in the various clips.]


Not to be a party pooper but I have some experience analyzing UFO footage and here is my assessment of the video clips...

0017: Does the fact that the Moon is covered in impact craters mean anything to anyone? What we see in this photo could easily be nothing more than asteroid in decaying orbit around the moon. Could be a UFO but thousands of meteors enter the Earths atmo every single day. In light of that fact, one can expect their to be objects in and around the Moon as well. They would be smart to track this object in order to avoid it on successive orbital passes.

0026: Probably just a balloon and a lens flair. The fact that these objects move in a way that suggest being carried by the wind is the first clue. Unfortunately, there is a very short clip of this and we are not seeing the entire flight path, which I suspect shows that the object is just floating with the wind. Balloons of all shapes and sizes are made for promos and such... looks like a big Hot Dog or something but probably not an alien craft.

0040: Old NASA footage... the Astronaut (can't remember who) later admitted to using beads of water on a piece of glass to try and make a fake UFO film... our boys just screwing around here.

1:03: "Tower of Babel," this is pretty anomalous looking but given the poor image quality, the entire edge of the Moon appears raggety, yet none of these other features are mentioned. It is obvious that the area in question is shrouded in shadows so this could easily just be the edge of a mountain, the rest of which is in the shadows. Still very interesting as there are many, many anomalous photos of "structures" on the Moon and the fact that NASA has admittedly airbrushed details out of photos is quite telling indeed!

1:22: Come on now... this is obviously a metal flange that came loose from something. There is a lot of junk floating around in orbit, hoses, wires, hunks of metal, etc. Nothing at all unusual. NASA or the Russians would not dare admit that they lost track of some spare parts in orbit as they would be liable for damages this kind of debris might cause to other satellites... hence, they say it's "unidentified."

1:37: Just because it's the Aurora, doesn't mean birds stop flying in the sky.

1:50: Fake, Fake, Fake!!! This is a STILL PHOTO with a moving object composited in! Note the film grain and hexagonal lens flairs that do not move because this is a static photo. Really lame attempt at a hoax. This clip should not even be in this video.

2:00: Another static photo with some fuzz or hairs in the bottom left corner. Either that or scratches on the negative. People make mistakes in dark rooms sometimes. Also could have been a scan or photo of an existing print where scratches or hair was on the print.This could also easily be a wiring harness or more space junk left floating around up there. Remember, the Russians did their space exploration on the cheap and cut a lot of corners budget wise. Also not inconceivable for enemies to put junk up there to interfere with satellites. A bunch of wires attached to a magnet might effectively ruin a satellite.

2:16: Again, astronauts fooling around with a bead of water or oil on a pane of glass and moving it around to catch the light. They were trying to make a fake UFO video here, the little rascals! One can very easily see the changes in light refraction as they move the droplet to different angles. This is an admitted hoax by one of our Astronauts.

2:44: Now we're talkin! This has a couple things I look for in authentic UFO video, high speed, quick maneuvering, etc. This might be the real thing!

2:54: The pulsating object might easily be a satellite in lower orbit. Many of these satellites spin in order to maintain a stable orientation and the flashing could be due to light reflecting off the surface as it spins. The object is out of focus as the cameras depth of field is that of the station in the foreground, thus, the background object appears as a bright blob. Stil could be a UFO but the above explanation is probably more likely.

2:58: Also probably another orbiter or satellite between MIR and the photographer. Note that this film was taken from many, many miles from MIR using a high powered telephoto lens. Telephoto lenses compress distance making foreground objects appear much larger than they really are. You can see this effect in Baseball broadcasts as the pitcher and batter seem the same size even though they are actually 60 feet apart. This is because the camera is waaaay back in the center field bleachers using a tele lens. This could be any small piece of debris or a satellite... there are approx 3000 satellites currently in orbit... it's getting a bit crowded up there and not unheard of for distant cameras to catch these things crossing their line of sight now and again. There are also other debris, such as micro meteors, ice particles, etc... anything spinning and going in a strait line is likely some common types of debris. It's not a crystal clear, ultra clean environment up there... there is lots of "stuff" floatin' around.

3:14: OK, sorry to say but this looks like a Photoshop job. NASA is very, VERY selective about releasing photos and has a stringent review policy. I hardly think something like this, if it were real, would slip by their many layers of scrutiny. I would like to see the source for this image as I suspect it has been altered from the original. But there is also the idea that TPTB might want to perpetuate UFO belief to cover their own anti-gravitics tech programs. Could also be a hunk of metal from a broken satellite or other space junk left up there by we humans. Or maybe a UFO but I doubt it.

3:21: More junk and pieces of debris. Look people... they don't often bring broken or replaced parts back as this adds weight to the craft. They want to be light as possible on reentry so what happens to the stuff they replace up there? I think there might be a bit of "space littering" going on up there.

3:30: Some hoses or wires attached to a metal plate... just more human space junk.

3:38: Some panel lights inside the craft or lens flare aberration. Another clip that is so lame it shouldn't be in this compilation.

4:14: A shadow moving across the Moons surface that seems to change directions as it goes... very interesting indeed! Another good clip that seems very anomalous! But the question is, are they filming the shadow of their own lander or is this shadow coming from another object. There is also the Command Module still in orbit above them that may be casting this shadow. The apparent movement of the shadow may be result of the lander moving about as it maneuvers. Interesting though.

4:51: Interesting anomaly in this shot. Looks like old video tape though which was very prone to pixel flare... keep in mind that there is some radiation up there and some of this old video equipment is not properly shielded. The CCD sensors in these cameras were sensitive to static as well which could cause pixels to become charged. I don't know why the clip ends immediately when the anomaly appears... that is suspicious. And I don't know if this is not just a clip from old, degraded video tape but it is strange none the less. Who knows, could actually be anomalous in nature but I would like to see the entire piece of footage for this one.

5:00: Supposed anomalous surface structures showing a pyramid shape or right angle. The image has been heavily enhanced and software designed to do this will sometimes artificially enhance pixels. This is not a reliable image due to that fact. There are roughly strait lines that do appear in nature from broken rock strata, etc, that can appear structured but are completely natural. The square pixel matrix in imaging CCDs also can produce patterned effects when the image is up-sampled. Enhancing and up-sampling cannot produce detail not present in the original image, but are capable of distorting the image in such a way as to be misleading. I don't find this image conclusive at all.

5:08: Skylab image... this is from the days of chemical-emulsion film. Seen anomalies like this in regular earth-bound photos as well and to me it looks like a flaw in the original film roll, where a droplet of some chemical landed on the film during manufacture. Not unusual at all for film... there is such a thing as manufacturer defects and the pattern of this looks a lot like some kind of liquid stain pattern present on the original, unexposed film stock.

5:11 Same as above explanation... looks like something splattered on several frames of original film stock, or there was a smudge or debris on the celluloid during manufacture.

5:17: Audio recording, "Houston we still have the Alien Spacecraft under observance." Hoax made by one of those amateur radio guys who monitor space comms. This has never been actually sourced to NASA or proven to be authentic. Besides, NASA is aware that there are people out their with equipment capable of picking up their coms so they would never openly say "Alien Space Craft," rather, as has been admitted by certain astronauts, they would use code words as they are trained in what to do should they see an ET craft. Completely fake in every way.

5:28: Obviously another piece of space junk... in this case some plastic sheeting. Again, if NASA has "officially classified," this then how's the photo get out to the public? And yet again I point out that it is not in NASA's interest to admit leaving, or losing track of, junk left in orbit, for obvious liability issues. Satellites cost millions to build and launch. If NASA damages one because of trash they left or lost up there, the law suits would be devastating to the program and their public image.

5:43: A NASA live feed broadcast on satellite TV. Now if they were tracking a UFO they would NOT have broadcast this! Again, there are 3000+ satellites up there, they are probably just tracking one of them. Bright light from sun reflecting of the surface of the orbital object and a dirty lens makes for this blobby, out of focus image with a tail on it... lens aberrations.

6:05: A series of images showing different objects many of which are probably loose hoses, parts, ice particles, etc. Some come into view as they come into the light around the earth... nothing unusual about that. Note that ice particles and small debris close to the camera lens are outside the depth of field and may appear as large blobs. Since there are no depth perception cues in a 2D image, it's hard to judge the size of objects near the camera lens. A nut or a washer a few feet from the lens might be interpreted by the untrained eye as a large object in the distance.

6:33: Gemini 4 Reentry... he's probably filming the final launch stage ring of the booster still in orbit. Whatever it is, it appears to be tumbling and free floating and not under intelligent control.

6:48: STS 123... now this is something very interesting! I have heard the explanation that these are ice particles but they look to be moving independently, however, depending on the height of the shuttle at the time, we may be looking at several satellites in lower orbits. They are not in real good focus as this is obviously taken from quite some distance with a telephoto lens. The camera is focused on the storm clouds so objects above that distance would appear out of focus as these do. Interesting though.

7:00: STS 75. Amazing clip here! I have no clue what this is and it seems truly anomalous. This is from the famed "Tether Mission" where they dragged a 12 mile-long wire through the earths magnetic field to try and generate electricity. The centrifugal force broke the tether which later seemed to be swarmed by hundreds of these strange objects that look much like the "Dropa Stones" which have turned out to be a probable hoax. Very interesting though as the object appears fairly well defined.

7:08: STS 48A... the "missile shot UFO," footage. The official explanation is that ice or debris particle was pushed by the firing of maneuvering thrusters on the shuttle. That is actually the most likely explanation. But if it is a missile, then only if it was launched by a nearby satellite would we see the flash, and conventional liquid or solid fuel missiles do not produce a solitary flash upon launch, rather they produce a constant thruster jet of flame so why would we see any flash at all? Others claim that a particle or laser beam was fired, which makes no sense unless you watch too many scifi movies... light travels at 186 miles per second and you cannot see the beam moving, much less have time to get out of the way by maneuvering... it would appear as a strait line if it were a beam weapon, therefore it is either a missile (in which case there should be no flash) or the official explanation is correct. If it's ice particles then the streak is probably some debris or ice particle that was very close to the thruster shooting away. Objects further away received less kinetic energy and moved less.

7:30: Another of these strange "Dropa" objects. Very strange indeed!

7:39: STS 48D "The Shape Shifter" ...very ridiculous... this is simply a corrugated hose floating freely, in fact, NASA confirmed this soon after it was filmed. There is no shape-shifting going on, simply the thing is flailing around. In space there is no air friction so slow movement.. if you whip a hose and let it go, it will continue to wiggle. This object is clearly tumbling and out of control, that is unless anyone believes the Aliens fly by letting their ships tumble wildly out of control. And if it was some form of living creature, again, why would it tumble freely out of control like that?

8:07: Interesting moving shadows cast on the Moons surface. Astronomers have been seeing stuff like this for years and they are very interesting. I would point out that small objects high above will cast very large shadows on the ground so this could well be asteroids or UFO's. If they are asteroids, then that is kind of scary as if they are sizable, it's a good thing they don't land here. But an asteroid the size of a car will burn up to the size of a pebble by the time it reaches the ground. I will note that many of these Moon shadows have been seen to change directions so this is very compelling and good evidence. Truly anomalous! I can't see this clip really being anything other than an intelligently controlled craft of some sort.

8:52: STS 80... one of the best pieces of evidence I've seen. I honestly don't know why NASA allowed this footage to be publicized. Important to note that the black dots at the center of these bright objects are caused by overexposure of the CCD element in the camera. When brightness values reach the upper limit of sensitivity in some older camera sensors, the result is an inability of the firmware to register the brightness value so the pixel values are interpreted as black... this is basically like shorting out the pixels with too much light to the point where they don't register at all and turn themselves off in order to prevent damage to the sensor... so that means these objects are either very bright, or the aperture of the camera is wide open. The objects appear to track behind the shuttle and illuminate one at a time in a circular pattern. However, it is possible that they are satellites in lower orbit, reflecting the sun off their shiny bodies. Very strange but I'm still a bit skeptical of this one thought I find it very compelling.

OK so that's my analysis. I am a UFO believer and don't wish to be viewed as being a debunker but I think it important to know the difference between images that are truly anomalous and ones that are explainable. Only a couple things worth viewing in this video though but the stand-outs are pretty compelling... the rest is not worth viewing. This whole video could have been reduced to about a minute and a half of the real worthy footage.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of strange anomalies, esoterica, politics, human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | cheap international voip calls